Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 03:25
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Origami structures unfold into seamless surfaces for deployable applications - Phys.org
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How do you go about getting invited to an orgy?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
The fate of the EV tax credits depends on the GOP’s megabill - NPR
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Japan’s oldest “human” fossils aren’t human at all, says new study - Glass Almanac
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Lawyers could face ‘severe’ penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns - TechCrunch